Diesel Injury Law

Diesel Injury Law Blog

Proving Your Railroad Cancer Claim at Trial: General Causation

When a railroad worker is diagnosed with cancer and files a railroad cancer claim under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), the railroad almost always says, “You can’t prove our workplace caused this cancer.” In court, this argument is put to the test through Medical Causation, which is made up of two parts: General Causation and Specific Causation.

Free Case Evaluation

    What is Medical Causation?

    Medical causation asks a simple question: Did workplace exposure on the railroad play a role in causing the worker’s cancer? Courts and doctors break the answer to this question down into two steps:

    • General Causation – “Can this type of exposure cause this disease?”
    • Specific Causation – “Did this person’s exposure cause their disease?”

    In simple terms, this is how railroad cancer claims are proven in court.  

    What is General Causation?

    The question of whether there is General Causation is simply asking “is this type of exposure known to increase the risk of this type of cancer?”

    General causation does not focus on the individual worker. Instead, it focuses on scientific and medical research involving groups of people to determine if there is any link between the type of exposure the worker is subject to and their condition.

    How General Causation is Proven

    To prove a link between exposure and cancer in a railroad cancer claim, doctors and experts rely on a wide variety of information, such as epidemiological studies, occupational health research, cancer registry data, and information from government and international health agencies.

    Experts compare cancer rates of exposed workers versus non-exposed workers. If the exposed group has higher cancer rates, that supports general causation.

    Matching the Exposure to the Disease

    In a FELA cancer lawsuit, you cannot simply say that “railroad work causes cancer.” Instead, you are required to show that this type of specific railroad exposure causes this type of specific cancer. Examples:

    If a form of exposure is not known in the scientific and medical community to cause the disease, the FELA cancer claim fails.

    Matching the Worker’s Exposure to the Studies

    Railroads will often argue that “those studies don’t apply to our workers,” claiming that the specific circumstances of those studies are not applicable to the situations their workers are in. 

    To refute these claims, experts must show that the types of exposure in the studies match those at the railroads. This includes showing:

    • The type of exposure (diesel exhaust, asbestos, silica)
    • The duration of exposure (months, years, decades)
    • The conditions of the exposure (enclosed or open spaces, ventilated or poorly ventilated)
    • The dose of exposure compared to study subjects

    Railroad workers are exposed daily, for decades, often in enclosed locomotive cabs, tunnels, poorly ventilated shops, and railroad yards. This often leads to railroad workers’ exposures being equal to or greater than those documented in the studies.

    Common General Causation Evidence in Railroad Cancer Lawsuits

    The World Health Organization (WHO), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), National Toxicology Program (NTP), and decades of occupational studies all recognize that diesel exhaust, asbestos, silica, and secondhand smoke are known human carcinogens.

    What General Causation DOES NOT Decide

    General Causation only shows that there is a link between a type of exposure and a cancer. It DOES NOT answer:

    • Whether this railroad caused a specific worker’s cancer
    • How much exposure a specific worker had
    • Whether other causes played a role in developing their disease

    These questions are addressed by Specific Causation, which we discuss in detail in our next blog in this series.

    Proving General Causation in Your Railroad Cancer Claim

    Establishing general causation is the essential first step in holding a railroad accountable for workplace illnesses. To succeed under FELA, you must show that scientific consensus recognizes a link between your specific exposure and your diagnosis. Anchoring your claim in medical research creates the foundation necessary to prove the railroad’s liability.

    Don’t let the railroad dismiss your illness as a coincidence. Our attorneys can help you gather the expert evidence needed to prove general causation and fight for your rights. Contact us today for a free, confidential case evaluation.

    Client Testimonials

    Real People. Real Cases.

    53 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago IL 60604 US
    (312) 877-5588
    5/5 based on 4 reviews

    Wrongful Death Case

    My family hired attorney Hughes for the wrongful death of my brother. Mr. Hughes worked very hard on our case, the results were excellent. I would recommend him to anyone needing an attorney, he is a very fair and kind person.

    Unique Expertise

    Andrew took over my asthma claim with the railroad after a different law firm failed to meet expectations. Andrew’s unique expertise in the field of diesel related injury gave him the ability to build my case exceptionally well. When Andrew presented...

    Professional and Trustworthy

    From my very first contact with Andrew we have found him to be compassionate, hard working and trust worthy. In the eight months we were associated with Andrew we feel he has also become a friend of ours...

    Worked Diligently

    For the past two years Andrew Hughes has worked diligently in helping me with my case against the Norfolk Southern R.R. During this time he has kept me thoroughly informed about my case his expertise led to me getting a generous settlement...


    Questions? We Can Help! Contact Us Today!